Showing posts with label Infertility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Infertility. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Hormone Might Help Restore Female Fertility

(HealthDay News) -- A hormone called kisspeptin may offer a new treatment for infertility, according to British researchers who found that the hormone can activate the release of sex hormones that control the menstrual cycle.

The study included 10 women who were not menstruating and were infertile due to a hormone imbalance. The researchers injected the participants with either kisspeptin or saline and then measured levels of two sex hormones -- luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) -- essential for ovulation and fertility.

The women who received kisspeptin had a 48-fold increase in LH and a 16-fold increase in FSH, compared to those who received the saline. The study is the first to show that kisspeptin can stimulate production of sex hormones in infertile women, according to the study's authors.

The findings were presented at a Society for Endocrinology meeting in the United Kingdom.

"This research shows that kisspeptin offers huge promise as a treatment for infertility," study author Dr. Waljit Dhillo, of Imperial College London, said in a society news release.

"From our previous results, we know that kisspeptin can stimulate release of reproductive hormones in healthy women. We have now extended this research to show that kisspeptin treatment has the same effect in women with infertility. In fact, our current data show that kisspeptin causes a greater increase in luteinising hormone production in non-menstruating women than in fertile women in the previous study," Dhillo said.

"This is a very exciting result and suggests that kisspeptin treatment could restore reproductive function in women with low sex hormone levels. Our future research will focus on determining the best protocol for repeated kisspeptin administration with the hope of developing a new therapy for infertility," he added.

According to the researchers, kisspeptin is an important regulator of reproductive function. Animals that lack kisspeptin function don't go through puberty and remain sexually immature.

More information
The U.S. National Women's Health Information Center has more about infertility.

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Father's Age a Factor in Infertility

(HealthDay News) -- Among couples with fertility problems, those in which the man is over the age 35 have lower pregnancy rates and increased chances of miscarriage, a new study shows.

To come to this conclusion, French researchers looked at more than 12,000 couples who went to a fertility clinic in France.

In most of the cases, the couples were being treated due to the man's infertility. The couples underwent a total of 21,239 intrauterine inseminations (IUIs).

The researchers found that women over age 35 had a pregnancy rate of 8.9 percent, compared to 14.5 percent in younger women.

"But we also found that the age of the father was important in pregnancy rates -- men over 35 had a negative effect. And, perhaps more surprisingly, miscarriage rates increased where the father was over 35," study author Dr. Stephanie Belloc, of the Eylau Center for Assisted Reproduction in Paris, said in a prepared statement.

This is the first study to document such a strong paternal effect on reproductive outcomes. The findings were presented Monday at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology annual conference, in Barcelona.

"How DNA damage in older men translates into clinical practice has not been shown up to now. Our research proves for the first time that there is a strong paternal age-related effect on IUI outcomes, and this information should be considered by both doctors and patients in assisted reproduction outcomes," Belloc said.

"We believe that the use of IVF or ICSI should be suggested to infertile patients where either party is over 35 years of age," she added.

More information
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine has more about infertility.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Scientists Turn Human Skin Cells Into Stem Cells

(HealthDay News) -- Two separate groups of scientists have succeeded in turning human skin cells into cells that are very similar -- but not identical -- to embryonic stem cells.

The two teams, one based in Japan and the other in Wisconsin, used slightly different methods to achieve essentially identical goals, researchers said.

"Embryonic stem cells can divide forever, and there has never been good evidence for such cells in adults, but this new paper shows a method to make cells essentially identical to embryonic stem cells," said James Thomson, senior author of the Wisconsin study and a professor in the departments of medicine and public health at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "This will change the ethical debate," he said at a teleconference held Tuesday.

"We are now in a position to be able to generate patient- and disease-specific stem cells, without using human eggs or embryos," added Dr. Shinya Yamanaka, senior author of the first paper, who is affiliated with Kyoto University in Japan and the Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease in San Francisco. "These cells should be useful in understanding disease mechanisms, searching for effective and safe drugs, and treating patients with cell therapy," he said.

One outside exert agreed the achievement could shift research away from embryonic stem cells.
"Here's verification of another source of multipotent cells that could be useful for treating disease and would get around some of the ethical issues related to embryonic sources," Paul Sanberg, distinguished professor of neurosurgery and director of the University of South Florida Center for Aging and Brain Repair in Tampa, told HealthDay. "It also demonstrates that there are many cells that can be reprogrammed in the body, and this is not going to be the last time we hear of other types of cells and other ways we can make multipotent."

Multipotency or pluripotency refers to the ability of stem cells to grow into a variety of cell types.
However, the journey from laboratory to patient therapy is still a long one, experts said.
"This is a proof of principle, but, in terms of application, there are many steps in between," said Dr. Robert Tsai, assistant professor in the Center for Cancer and Stem Cell Biology at Texas A&M Health Science Center Institute of Biosciences and Technology in Houston.

The achievements followed closely on the heels of another breakthrough: Last week, U.S. scientists announced that they had created dozens of cloned embryos from a 10-year-old male macaque, a primate. This puts science one step closer to human cloning, those authors stated.

Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they have the ability to develop into virtually any cell type in the body. The hope is that such cells may one day yield treatments or cures for diseases such as diabetes, liver failure, spinal injury, stroke, Alzheimer's disease and heart disease.

However, harvesting embryonic stem cells involves destroying a viable embryo, stirring much political debate. In the United States, embryonic stem cell research has been severely limited since August 2001, when President George W. Bush placed limits on federal funding of the field and restricted the number of embryonic stem cell lines that could be used.

Since that time, researchers have been racing to find other sources of viable stem cells. The approach documented in these two studies would circumvent the need for embryos and, thus, would bypass any controversy. The findings of Yamanaka's team are detailed in the Nov. 30 print issue of Cell, and the Wisconsin group's work was released online Tuesday by Science.

Last year, Yamanaka's team transformed mouse skin cells into pluripotent stem cells.

This year, the researchers tried the same method in humans: using a retrovirus to activate specific transcription genes in the skin cells. Transcription genes regulate gene expression, explained Yamanaka.

Using this method, his group generated about 10 cell clones from 50,000 human facial skin cells.
The new "induced pluripotent stem" (iPS) cells were identical to embryonic stem cells in terms of appearance and behavior in cell culture. They also expressed genetic markers that were the same as those observed in embryonic stem cells.

The iPS cells could also differentiate into other tissue types, the team found.

However, a screen of more than 30,000 genes showed that the iPS cells were not actually indistinguishable from embryonic stem cells. In fact, roughly 1,000 genes were expressed differently.

"Human iPS cells are similar, but not identical, to human embryonic stem cells, Yamanaka said. "DNA microarray analyses identified differentially expressed genes between the two stem cell lines. Further studies are required to determine whether human iPS cells can replace human ES cells."

The team at the University of Wisconsin-Madison also used human skin cells, then added two of the same genes as Yamanaka's team and two different genes in their approach. The outcome was essentially the same.

"The actual combination of the factors they put in are different, the rationale is the same," Tsai explained. "There are some tiny differences between the two different combinations."

The advent of the new cells does not render embryonic stem cells unnecessary, however.

"This does not mean that it is the end of embryonic stem cell research, if only that we need a gold standard to compare to," the University of Wisconsin's Thomson told reporters. "Over time, I believe embryonic stem cells will be used by fewer and fewer labs. These new stem cells would not have been derived if it had not been for the last 10 years of research on embryonic stem cell lines. I do, nonetheless, think that the world has changed."

Can the newly designed cells be used to clone humans? "Any cell in the body can do that," Thomson said. "It's probably true of these cells, if you manipulate them enough, but not if you put them in the body as they are."

It's not clear in either of the two new studies if the cells are completely pluripotent or if one line is more efficient than the other. "Will they have the ability to fully differentiate?" Tsai asked. "There's some evidence that they can move from a differentiated state to an undifferentiated state, but will they be able to reverse back?"

"We have to be sure the cells are safe," Yamanaka said. "One of the difficulties about human embryonic stem cells is their tumorigenicity [propensity to develop tumors]. Because of the usage of retroviruses, iPS cells may be more tumorigenic than human embryonic stem cells. We will have to find a way to avoid retroviruses."

But for the more immediate purposes of drug discovery and toxicology, the use of retroviruses is not a big problem, Yamanaka added.

iPS may present their own ethical concerns, however, if they are used to generate sperm and egg cells. "This might help people with infertility problems, but it will be essential to have proper regulation regarding the generation and usage of human iPS cells to avoid misusages of this technology," Yamanaka said.

More information
Learn more about stem cells at the International Society for Stem Cell Research.

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Diet, Lifestyle Changes Cut Some Infertility Risk

(HealthDay News) -- Women who followed at least five certain lifestyle and diet behaviors were about 80 percent less likely to have infertility from ovulatory disorders than women who followed none of the behaviors, a Harvard study concludes.

The analysis of 17,544 married women participating in the ongoing Nurses' Health Study II found those with the highest fertility scores: ate less trans fat and sugar from carbohydrates; consumed more protein from vegetables than from animals; ate more fiber and iron; took more multivitamins; had a lower body mass index (BMI); exercised for longer periods of time each day; and consumed more high-fat diary products and less low-fat diary products.

The relationship between these behaviors and reduced risk of infertility was similar for women regardless of age and whether they'd been pregnant in the past, said the Harvard School of Public Health authors of the study, which was published in the Nov. 1 issue of the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology.

"We analyzed what happens if you follow one, two, three, four, or more different factors. What we found was that, as women started following more of these recommendations, their risk of infertility dropped substantially for every one of the dietary and lifestyle strategies undertaken.

In fact, we found a sixfold difference in ovulatory infertility risk between women following five or more low-risk dietary and lifestyle habits and those following none," lead author Jorge Chavarro, a research fellow in the school's department of nutrition, said in a prepared statement.

"The key message of this paper is that making the right dietary choices and including the right amount of physical activity in your daily life may make a large difference in your probability of becoming fertile if you are experiencing problems with ovulation," senior author Walter Willett, chair of the department of nutrition, added.

According to the researchers, infertility affects one in six couples, in the U.S. and Europe and ovulatory problems have been identified in up to 30 percent of those cases.

More information
The U.S. National Women's Health Information Center has more about infertility.

Sunday, January 22, 2006

More Evidence Soy Causes Fertility Problems

Many of you already know soy -- the processed kind used in countless products sold in your grocery store -- isn't a "safe" health product, despite all the rhetoric from health "experts" and food manufacturers. In fact, genistein, a major soy component, impairs the travel of sperm to an egg. A new study has found genistein to be much more harmful far earlier in the lives of mice, as it can disrupt the development of ovaries in newborn females.

Scientists injected newborn mice with three different amounts of genistein, comparable to what human babies may receive in a soy-based formula, during the first five days of life, then observed the damage.

Mice given the highest dose of genistein were infertile (the highest number of egg cells that remained in clusters and unable to separate), while those treated with lower doses had fewer pregnancies and fewer pups per litter. Because the presence of genistein prevents egg cells from separating, they are less likely to become fertilized, researchers said.

The damage genistein can do isn't confined to mothers either. Your baby may suffer from inhibited intestinal growth if you feed him or her a soy-based formula too. Just more reasons to breastfeed your baby whenever possible, or use healthier alternatives instead.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol. 174, No. 1, January 2006: 161-168

EurekAlert January 10, 2006

more info at:
http://www.dreddyclinic.com/integrated_med/integrated_med.htm

ClickComments

Balancing Your Hormones Without Drugs... You Can Feel Good Again

Balancing Your Hormones Without Drugs... You Can Feel Good Again

$19.95
[ learn more ]

Add to Cart

Hormone imbalance can be reversed! Look and feel better than ever, just take the time to learn about yourself and read the information contained in this just released e-book about reversing hormone imbalance. Are you ready to finally look and feel great? If so... read on... - E-Book Version.(BH)